Hello! I have several thoughts and proposals about current OpenHPI implementation.
o) We use Glib and the library provides nice set of cross-platform routines. We may try to use it more substantially. For example there are a log of routines for working with time and date. We can use it instead of non-cross-platform gettimeofday() and localtime_r(). Another example, there is a set of routines for working with dynamically loaded modules. We can use it instead of libltdl which now deals with OpenHPI plug-ins. Another example, there is a set of routings for system logging, debug and error messages. We can use it instead of syslog() and printf(). Another example, there is a set of routings for command line agruments parsing. We can use it instead of getopt(). Glib documentation is avalable there - http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/ o) OpenHPI documentation and ./configure claim that we want glib >= 2.2.0. Which is a very old one. Shall we consider to use features of newer library versions? What say? Anton Pak ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Openhpi-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
