Hi,
I didn't hear anything after Anton's remark.
So can we go forward and use functions available in glib 2.14?
Or which is the newest version we can require?
My Fedora is on glib 2.26.

I would like to proceed implementing common option parsing in clients and
also the daemon,
which should be done using glib functions, that were provided step by step
between glib 2.6 and 2.14.

Cheers,
Uli



-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: SourceForge.net [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2011 17:17
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [oh-tracker] [ openhpi-Feature Requests-3141155 ] Move to
newerversion of glib2


Feature Requests item #3141155, was opened at 2010-12-21 10:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ulikleber
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=532254&aid=3141155&group_i
d=71730

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: 2.17.x
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Ulich Kleber (ulikleber)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Move to newer version of glib2

Initial Comment:
OpenHPI build requires glib 2.2.0, which is very much outdated.
I propose to move to an updated version and check the dependency in
configure.
There are new functions provided which could be used when implementing
feature 1493787.
I propose to require at least glib 2.14.
Please comment.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Ulich Kleber (ulikleber)
Date: 2011-01-19 17:16

Message:
The attached patch modifies configure.ac, so it will be checked for glib
2.14.

There were no objections to this move yet. So glib 2.14 will be required
and clients will use functions like g_option_context_get_help to implement
long options.
glib 2.14 was released in 2007.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Anton Pak (avpak)
Date: 2010-12-21 10:32

Message:
>From there http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/glib/

you can see that 2.14 was released about Aug 2007.

>From there http://openhpi.org/Distributions

you can see that at least Debian and Suse use very old OpenHPI.

I guess we need to ask Bryan (who is Debian maintainer) and someone from
Suse if they are OK with the proposal.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=532254&aid=3141155&group_i
d=71730

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
openhpi-tracker mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-tracker


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to