Yes, end of September / beginning of October.
I am going to issue -2weeks notice around Sep 15.
Anton Pak
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:33:59 +0400, [email protected] <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Anton,
>
> Are you planning for the release in October? Let's know when you want to
> freeze the checkins on the release branch/trunk.
>
> Thanks
> Mohan
>
>
> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 14:34 +0400, Anton Pak wrote:
>> If we follow order when even release numbers are stable then my point is
>> to have 3.0 as 2.17 stabilization.
>> Or we never get away of 2.x.
>>
>> Yes, we shall maintain x86. I meant only binary builds of OpenHPI for
>> Windows.
>>
>> Anton Pak
>>
>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:00:16 +0400, [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Anton,
>> >
>> > Since we had many bug fixes but we did not have major new features, do
>> > we want to call this 2.18?
>> >
>> > I do not know how the stats work. We use svn export most of the time
>> in
>> > addition to the tarball downloads. Almost all of our downloads are for
>> > Linux. In addition many customers are using the packages shipped on
>> the
>> > distros. That's one of the reason we get many queries on the old
>> > releases in the mailing list as well as personal mails. x86 does lack
>> > popularity compared to x86_64. But it is still used by many. I think
>> we
>> > need to maintain it.
>> >
>> > my $0.02
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Mohan
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 15:44 +0400, Anton Pak wrote:
>> >> Hello!
>> >>
>> >> Suggest planning next stable OpenHPI release (3.0) to the end of
>> >> September
>> >> / beginning of October.
>> >> Correct me if I am wrong - there have been no big bugfixes and new
>> >> features since 2.17 so
>> >> stabilization makes sense.
>> >> What say?
>> >>
>> >> Stats for 2.17 showed 96 downloads since June:
>> >> - 38 for source tarball
>> >> - 42 for Windows (AMD-64, gcc4) build
>> >> - 12 for Windows (x86, gcc4) build
>> >> - 4 for Windows (x86, gcc3) build
>> >> Seems x86 builds lack popularity. We may exclude them from the
>> >> distribution.
>> >>
>> >> Bryan, do you still have plans for getting documentation out of the
>> >> source
>> >> tarball?
>> >>
>> >> Anton Pak
>> >>
>> >>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
>> >> Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
>> >> Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
>> > Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
>> > Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
Learn about the latest advances in developing for the
BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more.
See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
