On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 00:32, Roland Dreier wrote: > Hal> Once there is a working MAD layer, there will be a new > Hal> official gen2 branch with just phase 1 deliverables. Then > Hal> stable and development branches. Development would add in CM, > Hal> etc. > > Hal> Does this mean roland_branch is intended to be this branch ? > > I don't think so. I always intended roland-merge to be a branch where > I could share my work. > > In fact it doesn't make much sense to me to add in hooks for compiling > the new MAD code etc. to my branch.
The only reason I requested this was for the transition period to minimize the duplication of changes as I am presuming you will want to continue your branch. Maybe that is an incorrect assumption (or presumption). > If you want to have a subversion > tree for testing now I would suggest making a new branch (copy > roland-merge to some new directory) and hack on that as much as you > want -- delete the old MAD code, etc. I'm not adverse to a new tree (in fact, openib-candidate would work as a this branch if it gets filled in.) but was trying to minimize the work until the phase 1 work was far enough along. I suspect that will take a little time. Who would be responsible for duplicating any mthca changes (and other layers like IPoIB) ? -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
