On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:59:09 -0700 Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND) += legacy/ core/ ulp/ hw/ > +obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND) += legacy/ core/ access/ ulp/ hw/ > > This doesn't really make sense to me. Why do we need a core/ and an > access/ directory? I prefer core/, since it matches drivers/usb/core, > net/core and sound/core already in the kernel tree, and "access layer" > is a bit of jargon that no one not familiar with the history of IB > stacks is going to understand. However if we prefer access/ then I'll > move everything from core/ there. I think core makes more sense, but I don't really care when we move to that directory structure. Maybe when we pull together the code... _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
