Sean> Note that returning -EBUSY from ib_cancel_mad would only
Sean> indicate that a callback *might* be invoked. It could have
Sean> already been called, which leads me to think that no return
Sean> value would be better than one that a client tries to use.
Agree... at least with the current implementation, the return value is
worse than useless (since trying to use it will almost inevitably be
buggy), so ib_cancel_mad should probably be a void function.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
