On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:20:05 -0400 Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 12:50, Sean Hefty wrote: > > I think we have other issues with the completion handling as well. > > Since we use a single CQ for both QPs, I think that we need to search > > the send_posted_mad_list to find the corresponding completion. > > We cannot assume that the completion matches with the request at the > > head of the list. > > > > This appears to be broken in the non-error case as well. > > > > I will happily create a patch to fix these issues. > > Is it worth fixing this for the current approach or should I just wait > for this patch ? I'll create a patch that uses separate send_posted_mad_list's for QP0/1, but try to keep the changes fairly minimal. I'll do this after changing the completion handling to use the current workqueue, rather than allocating a separate thread. (I've canned my user-mode work, since Roland is further along.) - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
