On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:23:28 -0400 Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no objection (but would like to understand more of the > perceived problem(s)). Perhaps this approach makes things simpler in > the long run, but I think the case of sending when the QP is not RTS > needs to be dealt with anyhow and make take care of the problems you > are concerned about. I think that we'll have to handle this as well, but think that it may be easier to handle it in error handling code only, rather than during initialization as well. This gets a little into how we handle immediate errors when posting sends, with respect to which errors result in the access layer queuing the MAD, versus errors that are reported to the user directly. But, I probably won't get to looking at that for a couple of weeks. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
