On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:24:35 -0500 Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 16:14, Sean Hefty wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:01:03 -0700 (PDT) > > Krishna Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I know this changes the verbs interface a bit, but ... > > > > > > I don't see a value in the qp_cap being passed to different > > > routines, when either ib_qp_attr or ib_qp_init_attr, both of which > > > contain a qp_cap, are being passed at the same time. > > > > The parameter is there to separate input/output parameters, and > > resulted from the original VAPI evolution of the code. There's no > > strong technical reason that it cannot be removed. > > Should this patch be applied ? If so, I will test this and then it can > also be merged to roland's branch. I'm fine with applying this patch - just wanted to let others provide input. We should probably modify ipoib before committing the changes. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
