Hi Hal, Yes, you are right. I was talking about this case with Sean, but forgot it when I actually sent the patch.
Please disregard it. thx, - KK On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 21:10, Krishna Kumar wrote: > > This is a minor cleanup/optimize in this area. No need to hold lock > > for too long (for atomic_inc), no multiple unlocks and normal case > > of finding mad_agent first. > > Doesn't this create a window between the unlocking after the mad_agent > is found and the atomic_inc ? Couldn't a deregistration occur then ? > > -- Hal > > > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
