Hi Hal, I think others have answered it, but my 2 cents :
1. Current driver doesn't do this, it is a spec thing, a potential driver could do this in future. It is useful in the sense that the CQ is always atleast the size of the QP's that are using it in case the driver implements it, as Sean mentioned. 2. The patches that you are referring to are correct. If people agree that it is useful to have, I can regenerate against latest bits (that is if it doesn't apply). thanks, - KK On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 14:21, Sean Hefty wrote: > > I think we should go ahead an put this code in. We need to handle the > > case where the QP is sized larger than what we request anyway, to ensure > > that we don't overrun the CQ. > > Does the driver do this (QP is sized larger than what was requested) now > ? Or is this a spec thing ? > > If so, just to make sure I have this straight, what is/are the specific > patch(es) ? Is it the 2 patches from Wednesday entitled "PATCH 1/2 > Resize CQ" and "PATCH 2/2 Implement error handling in resize failure". > > Thanks. > > -- Hal > > > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
