On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 15:41 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > One more thing: > Do we also want to say something about no SM right now ? Or is that > putting a cosmic kick me sign on ?
Actually, I thought we agreed that this was necessary to have before we submit to lkml. At least for inclusion. How is somebody going to test the openib code without an SM. (And no, buying a topspin switch is not the answer :-P Nor is using Solaris, or the old gen1 stack) -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
