On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 18:37 +0200, shaharf wrote: > > > > I believe the current feeling in the kernel community is that kernel > > headers should be kernel only and if userspace needs a header file, > > there should be a separate userspace version of the file. > > > > - Roland > > OK, I accept that for most IB types and structures, but what about > ib_user_mad structure & header? > > I suggest exposing that header to the user space (like many other files, > asm/errno for example), or alternatively to use only well known > structures for the device (I am not sure if that is feasible).
Right, but that should be part of some *other* package (not the kernel). A copy of the file, like how glibc ships kernel headers separately. -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
