> > Are you saying to have other forms of MAD like cancel by mgmt_class, > cancel > > by SGID and/or SLID in addition to cancel by TID ? We could do this if > there > > is a need. I don't think that need has been demonstrated (at least yet). > > No - I'm not suggesting that we have more ways to cancel a MAD. I was > simply pointing out that we _could_ have cancel_mad work based on TID + > mgmt_class + SGID/SLID (which would match uniqueness as defined by the > spec), rather than just TID. > > I think canceling MADs based on the wr_id is sufficient. > > - Sean
Sean, I totally agrees, I too think canceling mads should be based on wr_id, but that requires to expose the we_id to the user mode level. This may overcome some problems that may result using TIDS. Shahar _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
