Hello! Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: [openib-general] Some Missing Features from mthca/user MAD access": > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 13:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I am trying to say it could be transparent. you could be running > > two sms and it could work more or less. > > I am not 100% sure that the SM state machine works for 2 SMs with the > same port GUID and priority. > > I think there may also an issue in the MAD layer API in terms of this in > terms of receiving SMInfos and getting them to the correct SM. > > If this (running 2 SMs on the same port) is important, I can look into > this further. > > -- Hal
Well, I was thinking for things like failover it could be nice. Or another example, I thought it would be nice if I could do all kind of queries for diagnostic purposes, without the need to integrate them directly into the SM code. Nothing specific, though. mst _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
