Roland wrote>The code in the kernel has the same license headers as the subversion >tree: dual GPL/BSD.
Here is the text I see in the headers: "* This software is available to you under a choice of one of two * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU * General Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file * COPYING in the main directory of this source tree, or the * OpenIB.org BSD license below:" This tells me that when the kernel.org people accepted the code into the kernel, they needed to accept it under one of the two licenses, GPL or BSD. Or am I missing something here ? I think they could have accepted it under BSD and then re-license it under the same dual license if they wanted, but I am not a lawyer. woody _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
