On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:33:18AM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote:On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:21 -0800, Libor Michalek wrote: > 3) Since the rest of the tree is not destabilized or effected in > any other way by the code, just check it into tree itself. > (e.g. gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/ulp/sdp) > > Anyone have thoughts on this? Personally I'm leaning towards #3, > but that's because it's the least amount of work for me. :)
I would like #3 as well. Libor, would it be possible to get a preview of what is going to be checked in? Maybe with a small one-pager about how to use it, etc?
You mean a quick description of the code, like the primary contents of each file and how to get it to do something ?
-Libor
I would be interested in knowing whether zero copy, asynchronous sockets made it into the code and, much like the SDP performance tests last year, a set of netperf figures and a comparison of cpu utilisation with bandwidth would be nice to whet my appetite.
I guess the main issue with location is in regard to what constitutes the kernel submission. AFAIK its still uncertain as to the legal position of using SDP code, is that right? or did it get resolved to everyone's satisfaction (esp greg kh :) )
Great work everybody
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
