On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 10:51 -0800, Tom Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 18:46 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Maybe you should lay down the requirement first. > > I'll take a crack at it. Let me know where I am off base. > > > - why do we need an intermediate API > > To get things working today with the code that people have already > written. To create a proof of concept. > > In any event, I am not proposing this API get kernel inclusion. Only a > wider audience than in the sourceforge DAPL project cvs tree. > > > - what differences does it > > ?? > > > - what devices does it abstract > > IB for now, any other RDMA capable transports later. > > > - what are the users > > NFS over RDMA, maybe -- so RPC. Anybody else know others? > uDAPL - Oracle, MPI kDAPL - iSER, NFS over RDMA, Lustre?
- Matt _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
