On Thu, Feb 10, 2005, Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:39:41PM -0800, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > > The kernel code should be lean and unless there is an immediate or short > > term use for a feature, it probably shouldn't be there. We should be > > asking "why keep it in the code?", not "why should we remove it from > > the code?" > > enums and typedefs are a (weak) form of documentation. > If people don't know the feature exists they won't know to look for it > in better forms of documentation that are privately available.
Good point, that makes sense too. > I'm generalizing since I have NFC what this attribute does specifically. > If someone publicly can say "Don't use this because..." then that would > be a good reason to remove the declaration too. It sounds like Mellanox doesn't want to support it and it's nonstandard anyway. JE _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
