On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:50:34PM +0200, Yaron Haviv wrote: > Just to add there is a Lustre NAL over kDAPL in development
As mention before we don't care about Lustre as it's not freely available. > And another grate benefit of kDAPL is the simplification of the Verbs & > Access Layer API, making the ULP's simpler to implement, where a lot of > common functionality is done by a shared library (kDAPL) > And with a socket like connection establishment flow, etc' shared code is always a good thing. But designing code to be shared for not yet existing consumers can end up in a big mess very soon - as can be seen very well from the DAPL example. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
