>Kanevsky, Arkady wrote,
>If Open IB wants to go with LGPL license it is fine with us. >We will need to take a voit on DAT Collaborative onit also. >But from what I see on reflector LGPL license is outside the current >bylaws of >Open IB and there is a discussion on it going on. Good point. >SO until this issue is resolved on Open IB we will add GPL license to >uDAPL (and kDAPL) >and will work on getting it ready for submission to Open IB. >Once the license the GPL license is approved by DAT we can move the dev >work on Open IB SF. >If Arlin is available he can start the work now. >Lets first identify what areas require changes. I think Arlin should be able to start pretty soon. He has a couple of other things on his plate that he is finishing up, but should be free'd up in a week or 2. In the mean time, he can start to take a look at what needs to be done, etc. I would think that initially, the first changes are to develop a provider that calls the new gen2 verbs APIs rather than the gen1 APIs. This should be a pretty straight forward port of what currently exists in your sourceforge project. There is also support for shared memory that is needed for Oracle, and I am not sure if that exists in any of the open source versions of DAPL. Arlin, feel free to chime in if there is anything that I missed that would need to be done to make uDAPL run on openib.org. woody _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
