On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 12:51, Sean Hefty wrote: > It looks like one way to handle this is to add a new field to struct > ib_cm_req_param: struct ib_sa_path_rec *cm_path. A user could easily > set this to the same path record referenced by the *primary_path field. > This would only be a small change to existing users.
Sounds straightforward. > I'm still not sure how to handle a failed path between the CMs. And > even if you could detect a failed path, recovering from it is difficult > without violating the REQ max_cm_retries. Is anyone planning on using APM? Won't the CM protocol time out in this case and this error be pushed back on the user ? Would the user then rerequest a PathRecord ? -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
