> -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:48 AM > To: Yaron Haviv > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; James Lentini; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [openib-general] putting in dead wood for DAPL and > similarabomination > > The current iSER code is 10928 LOC, add to that 22155 LOC of kDAPL (not > including the actual provider for IB) and 5822 LOC linux-iscsi kernel > code. Compare that to the 25412 LOC total for drivers/infiniband in Linux > 2.6.11.
As Tom indicated we expect a significant code shrink for kDAPL, it will be much more Linux friendly when we are done with it, some parts will be re-written. Also the iSER code is not optimal in terms of LOC, and we can clean up some redundant code if we are in an LOC contest, I believe after we glue all the layers we will focus on reducing LOCs and test code. > Here's the challenge: if someone gets me the funding I'll write > complete iSER of IB implementation in less than 10k LOC based on the > open-iscsi code if someone gets me the funding. You know there is also the challenge of making it work, perform, interoperate, and support some features, not all is about LOC :) Anyway thanks for offering us support we may take you up on the some day Yaron _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
