> > > It doesn't seems like a good idea to reinvent cluster management in an > > IB-specific way. I would rather see this sort of thing built on top of > > an existing tool like Ganglia (http://ganglia.sf.net). > > While I don't agree taht ganglia is the right thing, I agree completely > with this point. Reinventing tools for booting, console, etc. in an > IB-specific way is a huge mistake. > > ron
Please note the IBPING is not really connected to the question if the idea to provide remote sys stat is good or not. Ibping is there to validate basic hardware and software functionalities. Ibsysstat is an optional usermode service that you run or not. If you don't like it and prefer running ganglia or anything else, please do. MHO is that this utility maybe very helpful for diagnostics and monitoring. I am against ideas where fundamental IB management mechanisms will rely on such mechanism and I guess that we all agree with that. Shahar _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
