Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] FMR support in mthca > > On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 20:03, Libor Michalek wrote: > > I haven't looked closely at the code yet, but I did try it out > > with SDP/AIO on a pair of x86 systems with Tavors and a pair of > > x86_64 systems with Arbels. With a small change to core/fmr_pool.c > > and enabling pool creation in SDP it worked as expected. Here are > > throughput results: > > > > x86 x86_64 > > -------- -------- > > SDP sync 610 MB/s 710 MB/s > > SDP async (hit) 740 MB/s 910 MB/s > > SDP async (miss) 590 MB/s 910 MB/s > > > > For sync sockets I used 81600 byte buffers. For async socket I kept > > 20 96K buffers in flight. For the FMR pool cache hit async results I > > used only 20 different buffers. For the FMR pool cache miss async > > results I used 1000 different buffers, of which only 20 were in flight > > at a time. > > Any idea why hit/miss make such a difference on x86 and not x86_64 ? > > Also, is all the code for this now checked available ?
Yes. > Thanks. > > -- Hal > -- MST - Michael S. Tsirkin _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
