On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 23:02 +0300, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > > > At this point, should it attempt to revive the port by bringing the > > physical link down and back up ? Should it try this several times > before > > declaring the port as "bad" ? In any case, this is a refinement on > the > > basic strategy for dealing with this scenario. > > > > Also, there could also be a periodic "ping" at a slower rate to > check if > > the "bad" ports revive. > [EZ] This will be released in gen1 within 2 weeks or so. The > enhancement to light sweep will include the irresponsive ports in the > light sweep. Once they respond a new heavy sweep will be generated. > Are you submitting these changes to gen2? If not, why not?
- Matt _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
