On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:09:50PM -0700, Bob Woodruff wrote: > > Libor ># /usr/local/bin/netperf -c -C -l 60 -H 10.0.0.30 -t TCP_RR -T 0,0 > >TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > 10.0.0.30 (10.0.0.30) port 0 AF_INET > >Local /Remote > >Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans. CPU CPU S.dem S.dem > >Send Recv Size Size Time Rate local remote local remote > >bytes bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec % S % S us/Tr us/Tr > > >16384 87380 1 1 60.00 16313.15 5.85 5.98 7.174 7.326 > >16384 87380 > > Hi Libor, > > What type of platform did you run this on ? CPU speed, type of HCA, etc.
I didn't run this, it was Grant, and those results were for IPoIB if I remember his email correctly. > Also, have you run netpipe on SDP, it shows BW and latency for various > sizes. No, I usually use ttcp or netperf which do pretty much the same thing, I would be surprised if netpipe showed radically different numbers. -Libor _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
