Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `ib_mad': Can't free
> all objects
>
> Hal> Also, does user_mad.c leak memory on the receive side if it
> Hal> is shutdown and the application has not drained the receive
> Hal> queue ?
>
> Yes, looks like it. Something like this (completely untested) should
> fix it, right?
>
> - R.
>
> --- infiniband/core/user_mad.c (revision 2211)
> +++ infiniband/core/user_mad.c (working copy)
> @@ -499,6 +499,7 @@ static int ib_umad_open(struct inode *in
> static int ib_umad_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> struct ib_umad_file *file = filp->private_data;
> + struct ib_umad_packet *packet, *tmp;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < IB_UMAD_MAX_AGENTS; ++i)
> @@ -507,6 +508,9 @@ static int ib_umad_close(struct inode *i
> ib_unregister_mad_agent(file->agent[i]);
> }
>
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(packet, tmp, &file->recv_list, list)
> + kfree(packet);
> +
> kfree(file);
>
> return 0;
>
Right, but this wont be related to the kmem_cache leak I see, will it?
--
MST - Michael S. Tsirkin
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
