I intentionally created a separate kdapltest directory in anticipation of needing to modify it to support changes in the DAT API for Linux. I do expect some divergence from the original test program.
While there isn't a need to make modifications to the coding style, I think the test could use a thorough review. In particular, I'd like to see a better separation between the client and server sides of the test. If anyone is interested in volunteering for that please let me know.
james
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:17 -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote:Why does kDAPLtest have to be pre-integrated with the kernel?
It was in a distinct directory for a reason.
You are correct. kdapltest does not need to be integrated and can be coded in whatever style you prefer.
-tduffy
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
