Quoting r. Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: [PATCH] kDAPL: remove DAT_BOOLEAN
> 
> I am sending this as a separate patch because I am not sure what the
> "right" thing to do is.  Looking around the kernel, it seems booleans
> are handled in different ways.  Some places, they are enums, others just
> #defines.
>
> In e1000, ixgb, compaq fc, DAT960, and xfs, they are enums.  In jfs and
> arch parisc, a bool is an int and TRUE and FALSE are #define'd.  TRUE
> and FALSE are defined so many times in the kernel, it seems rather
> ridiculous.  Maybe the right thing to do is fix the whole kernel in a
> consistent way and submit an upstream patch, but this will require quite
> a bit of janitorial work.

Further, include/linux/synclink.h has
#define BOOLEAN int

and include/linux/arcdevice.h has
#define bool int

> I don't mind using either way in kDAPL (or some third -- getting rid of
> bool's all together?),but this patch uses the enum method.  At least we
> need to get rid of the DAT_ prefix.

Is this type ever packed and passed on the wire? If yes that would
be a valid reason for something DAT_BOOLEAN, to make sure it has
a specific size.

> Singed-off-by: Tom Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Surprisingly, some DAT code just uses "bool" (below).

> Index: linux-kernel/test/dapltest/include/dapl_proto.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-kernel/test/dapltest/include/dapl_proto.h   (revision 2295)
> +++ linux-kernel/test/dapltest/include/dapl_proto.h   (working copy)
> @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ Bpool *         DT_BpoolAlloc (Per_Test_
>                              DAT_COUNT seg_size,
>                              DAT_COUNT num_segs,
>                              DAT_COUNT alignment,
> -                            DAT_BOOLEAN enable_rdma_write,
> -                            DAT_BOOLEAN enable_rdma_read);
> +                            boolean_t enable_rdma_write,
> +                            boolean_t enable_rdma_read);
>  
>  bool            DT_Bpool_Destroy (Per_Test_Data_t * pt_ptr,
>                                 DT_Tdep_Print_Head *phead,
> @@ -267,13 +267,13 @@ bool            DT_Performance_Test_Serv
>  bool            DT_Performance_Test_Create (Per_Test_Data_t * pt_ptr,
>                                          DAT_IA_HANDLE * ia_handle,
>                                          DAT_IA_ADDRESS_PTR remote_ia_addr,
> -                                        DAT_BOOLEAN is_server,
> -                                        DAT_BOOLEAN is_remote_little_endian,
> +                                        boolean_t is_server,
> +                                        boolean_t is_remote_little_endian,
>                                          Performance_Test_t **perf_test);
>  

-- 
MST - Michael S. Tsirkin
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to