[[ Please, Caitlin, keep discussion on list ]] On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 09:46 -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote: > Which of the following are you thinking of? > > a) changing enums to #defines? > b) changing the value of the enums > c) eliminating the entire bit-stuffed layered error code approach
I think c. As this is how the rest of the kernel deals with return values and errnos. > If either of the latter two are contemplated, how will the code > interoperate with user mode applications coded with the > reference dat include files? A shim layer? Not a kernel problem. -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
