Quoting r. Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: umad abi 2 v 3 and multicast join failed > > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:07:25PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > In general, given that kernels 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 are shipping with ABI > > version 2, does it make sense to avoid problems like this by keeping > > the old userspace code around and having the library decide at runtime > > which ABI to use? > > Only if you want to continue providing fixes for 2.6.11 and 2.6.12. > It would be nice if someone put together a source snapshot that > would work with those releases. But I'm not sure how to > make that available to some random person who is using it.
Making a subversion branch could be one way to start. Actually, it would be quite useful if whatever is submitted to mainline is kept on some subversion branch, too. Roland - would that disrupt your development process a lot? -- MST - Michael S. Tsirkin _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
