At 02:20 AM 5/26/2005, Venkata Jagana wrote: >I would like to really understand the technical reasons why you say RNIC-PI is >irrelevant to Linux kernel. >RNIC-PI is developed to support not only the RNICs but it is also IB >compatible.
I'm not Roland, but my belief is that until RNIC-PI exists as working code on a reference implementation, it is in fact not yet relevant to Linux. Perhaps you can outline the schedule to get there? I will point out that Roland's "science project" driver, which forms the base for the current OpenIB implementation, was released to the community on May 17, 2004 - one year ago. It is my assertion* that OpenRDMA must work with, and within, OpenIB to create a single RDMA implementation for Linux, in order to create the best and broadest support, as early as possible. Ok, so the names are a little upside-down. :-) Tom. * <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7131591&forum_id=43037> _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
