Roland> Yes, that is probably a better way of saying what I was
Roland> trying to drive at. There's a significant portion of
Roland> kDAPL that doesn't seem necessary or useful to me. For
Roland> example, why do we need a new API for posting work
Roland> requests? Why do we need the ability to combine
Roland> completion events and CM events into a single queue?
By the way, just to be clear, I definitely do support having library
code that makes it easy to perform operations such as, for example,
"connect this QP to such-and-such IP address." This would be useful
for SDP, NFS/RDMA and iSER, which all should be able to have common
code that runs on top of both InfiniBand and iWARP.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
