> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Talpey, Thomas > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 5:28 AM > To: Venkata Jagana > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: [Rdma-developers] Re: [openib-general] OpenIB and > OpenRDMA: Convergence on common RDMA APIs and ULPs for Linux > > At 02:20 AM 5/26/2005, Venkata Jagana wrote: > >I would like to really understand the technical reasons why > you say RNIC-PI is irrelevant to Linux kernel. > >RNIC-PI is developed to support not only the RNICs but it is > also IB compatible. > > I'm not Roland, but my belief is that until RNIC-PI exists as > working code on a reference implementation, it is in fact not > yet relevant to Linux. Perhaps you can outline the schedule > to get there? >
That is a slightly circular argument. The primary reason that work to implement DAPL and IT-API over RNIC-PI is not already in progress is the pressure to come up with a "one stack" solution. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
