On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 17:37, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 17:33, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > May 27 01:44:09 [43005960] -> osm_vl15_post: 4294967295 MADs on wire, > > 2 MADs outstanding. > > > > Hal> I take that back. That's just a lot of MADs have been sent > > Hal> (on the IB wire). OpenSM was probably up and running for a > > Hal> while... > > > > I find it hard to believe that OpenSM has sent 4 billion MADs -- > > that's more than 1000 MADs a second for a solid month. It also looks > > very suspicious that the value is equal to ((unsigned int) -1). > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > on a 32 bit machine. > > Good point. The fact that it gets to -1 is significant as I think that > is used as a magic value for some computations.
I'm pretty sure that I see a way this could have gone negative in the vendor layer. I'm working on a patch for this. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
