On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 12:04 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > That beeing said, one of the first thing you should get rid of if you > want to be able to take code from kdapl to the generic rdma code is way > it deals with handles. The kdapl code gives up language type safety > just to add its own bandaided type system below. Please always pass the > real struct pointer around, or at least the generic struct type which > might be embedded into a bigger structure, and get rid of all the magic > number checking and magic macros that expect special members at the > beginning of all objects behind these handles.
I absolutely agree with this and was planning on implementing said changes in the near future. James, can I get a "hell yeah" or a "no freaking way" from you before I go off and start writing patches? -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
