Roland Dreier wrote:
Sean> I haven't been able to determine the cause of the MAD Sean> crashes, so I was going to separate the CQs for QP 0 and 1 Sean> to give me more context/state information when a completion Sean> occurs.Sean> Is this a change that we want permanently? If so, I will Sean> cleanup the change for submission, otherwise, I'll just do Sean> it quickly to help identify the cause of the issue. I don't see a reason to care either way, so as far as I see, we may as well stick with what we've got. On the other hand, if splitting the CQs is an improvement then we should do it.
Separately would likely increase the number of interrupts seen by the system, but allows separate completion processing of SMI and GSI traffic... I don't see a strong reason for the change, and am only making the change to give myself more context when a completion event occurs at this point. (So I'll know exactly which queue I should be accessing.)
- Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
