Roland> Does this solve a real problem? As far as I know, the C
Roland> standard requires any pointer fields not explicitly named
Roland> in a designated initializer for a structure to be
Roland> initialized to NULL.
In other words -- since my previous post was kind of incomprehensible --
I think wr.next is already being initialized to NULL and this patch
doesn't do anything.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
