On 6/2/05, Libor Michalek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:43:47PM -0400, William Jordan wrote: > > > > The udev support/naming works fine. Regarding naming, the ib_uverbs > > and ib_umad drivers only put port specific devices in the /dev/infiniband > > directory. They also create non-port specific device nodes > > /dev/infiniband_mad > > and /dev/infiniband_verbs. Would it be more consistent to create a > > /dev/infiniband_cm instead of /dev/infiniband/cm? > > You are right, I hadn't noticed the distinction before, looks like > /dev/infiniband_cm is the way to go. > > -Libor >
Actually, I think I'm wrong. On my system, /dev/infiniband_mad is the same device as /dev/infiniband/umad1, and /dev/infiniband_verbs is the same device as /dev/infiniband/uverbs0. Should the device nodes /dev/infiniband_mad and /dev/infiniband_verbs exist at all? Are they artifacts of the way the classes work, or a setup problem on my system? Do other people have these nodes? Unless I've gotten it wrong (again), I believe /dev/infiniband/ucm (as it exists) is an appropriate device name for the userlevel cm. Sorry for the confusion. -- Bill Jordan SilverStorm Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
