On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 15:21 -0700, Tom Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 18:12 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > With this change, able to interoperate with Solaris 10 SA client (which
> > uses RMPP) with OpenSM
> 
> Cool.  I will give it a try.  What do you mean by interop?  Were you
> able to bring up IPoIB and ping?

Nevermind.  Just tried it with Solaris Nevada build 16 and it works
too!  

Albeit with some minor caveats.  For instance, a broadcast ping from
Linux does not see the Solaris node:

This is a linux system:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ping 192.168.0.0 -b
WARNING: pinging broadcast address
PING 192.168.0.0 (192.168.0.0) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.233: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.054 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.26: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.159 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.0.233: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.016 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms (DUP!)

From the Solaris system:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ping -s 192.168.0.0
PING 192.168.0.0: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.78: icmp_seq=0. time=0.501 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.233: icmp_seq=0. time=5.95 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.26: icmp_seq=0. time=10.4 ms

Solaris 10 was unhappy:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ifconfig ibd0 plumb
ifconfig: SIOCSLIFNAME for ip: ibd0: no such interface
Jun  7 15:29:02 blissom.SFBay.Sun.COM ip: ibd0: DL_ATTACH_REQ failed: DL_BADPPA
Jun  7 15:29:02 blissom.SFBay.Sun.COM ip: ibd0: DL_BIND_REQ failed: DL_OUTSTATE
Jun  7 15:29:02 blissom.SFBay.Sun.COM ip: ibd0: DL_PHYS_ADDR_REQ failed: 
DL_OUTSTATE
Jun  7 15:29:02 blissom.SFBay.Sun.COM ip: ibd0: DL_UNBIND_REQ failed: 
DL_OUTSTATE

Which made my Nevada box unhappy:

< from dmesg >
interface ibd0 to 192.168.0.78 broken: in=3 ierr=0 out=5 oerr=2

-tduffy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to