Do you see any additional stability problems after applying this? I'm
updating my OpenIB tree to see if that is my problem.
james
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Tom Duffy wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 15:48 -0400, James Lentini wrote:
I like this update Tom.
I'd propse a few changes:
- remove dat_cno because it is not part of the kDAPL API
- remove DAT_HANDLE_TO_PROVIDER
- we can provide the functionality of dat_set_consumer_context and
dat_get_consumer_context very easily by creating a dat_common
structure (see my patch). In that case we can remove
the user_context member from the dapl_common structure.
- I've added the symbols removed from dat.h to kdat.h for legacy
support.
Let me know what you think.
This looks real good, James. I agree with all of your changes.
-tduffy
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
