On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:27 -0400, James Lentini wrote: > Tom, > > I think this change has a lot of merits, but I would prefer to defer > this sort of change until we have a more stable provider. Once we have > removed the bugs and finished our update of the provider code > (removing the custom DAPL data structures, etc.), then I think we > should revisit this topic. > > Does that sound reasonable?
Ok, I can wait. I definitely understand the need to stabilize the provider and not introduce any new bugs. I will start playing around again with getting rid of dapl's own linked lists. -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
