On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:00, Talpey, Thomas wrote: > At 09:49 AM 6/14/2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >Are you proposing that the number of retries be set to 0 then > >(regardless of the timeout requested) ? > > All I am suggesting is that the number of retries is not something the > consumer can or should be specifying. Whatever the appropriate > number is, is something for the transport to choose. It's an > internal detail.
Yes, I was proposing that that this be calculated internally based on the requested timeout. Sorry if that was not clear. > >The CM is not using exponential backoff. > > Okay, though I would suggest it should. In any case, iWARP (TCP) > does, and that's important to bear in mind. It could easily be made to do this. What do others think about this ? -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
