Can we use the patch/kdat.h header to work around this? That is were
we have been putting symbols for compatibility between the
collaborative and Linux kDAPL headers.
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
If you eliminate the version info how would someone test DAT 1.3 code?
Is support for 1.3 just supposed to magically appear in the mainline at
some future date without intermediate testing?
On 6/14/05, James Lentini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this is a good change. If we trim the dat_provider_info
structure down to just an IA name, then we should be able to remove it
all together. We don't have to do that on this pass though.
I have a question about the change you've proposed for the makefile:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Index: dat/Makefile
===================================================================
--- dat/Makefile (revision 2588)
+++ dat/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
EXTRA_CFLAGS += \
- -Idrivers/dat \
- -Werror
+ -I$(obj)
Is $(obj) the directory containing the object files (drivers/dat)?
Is the -Werror flag already being setup by kbuild?
obj-$(CONFIG_DAT) += dat.o
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
