On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 12:19, Roland Dreier wrote: > Sure, I understand why NFS/RDMA wants the peer address. However, > forcing this into kDAPL and then making kDAPL go through contortions > to provide it seems like the wrong way around. We end up with gross > hacks like ATS, which only works for IPv4 and doesn't support multiple > IP addresses on a single interface.
Why do you say ATS only works for IPv4 and doesn't support multiple IP addresses on a single interface ? It certainly does the later. Both IPv4 and v6 addresses are accomodated in the ATS SR definition. Any IPv4ness of the some ATS APIs (and the underlying implementation) need to be enhanced for IPv6. That is on the TODO list. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
