On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:04:16PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >Hi Eitan, > >On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 15:25, Eitan Zahavi wrote: >> Following the discussion about the debug tools, I would like to >> propose using OpenSM Vendor layer as a common layer for developing the >> debug tools.
Hal, This is kinda offtopic, but (iirc) i once stumbled over the issue of "port" vs. "mgmt port" [back then i had access to two 2-port cards] where you may have said something along the lines of \"There is clearly a bug for multi HCAs in osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr which is in the vendor layer. This needs to be fixed and is our problem. So I am close to being able to commit what I now have for this and fix this later (as there are other multi HCA issues).\" Just curious.. did somebody already have a chance to touch those or not? On a related note (just the same thing, i tend to think) /* "local ports" is(?) phys, shouldn't this exclude port 0 then ? */ I'm not too familiar with these kindof questions, which might be define in a spec, so any hint on this would be well received, at least from my part. anyone? Eitan? -- thank you, Bernhard _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
