Gleb> Yes, but don't forget the first part of my patch (for
Gleb> libibverbs/src/device.c) I think it should be applied to.
Yes, I guess it makes sense.
> - mm = get_task_mm(current);
Gleb> Are you sure that ib_umem_account will run on behalf the
Gleb> process that schedules it? Anyway you are correctly using
Gleb> work->mm in the rest of the function so this line should be
Gleb> dropped I think.
The '-' at the beginning of the line means it is being deleted in the
patch! Of course schedule_work() delegates the work to a different
process so the get_task_mm() must be done in the original process.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
