On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:18:53PM -0400, James Lentini wrote: > >Committed in revision 2751. > >On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >halr> I was able to build udapltest for both x86 and x86-64 with the following >halr> change: >halr> >halr> uDAPL: Fix compile of dapl_bpool.c on x86_64 >halr> >halr> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >halr> >halr> --- userspace/test/dapltest/test/dapl_bpool.c.orig 2005-01-18 >halr> 13:20:31.000000000 -0500 >halr> +++ userspace/test/dapltest/test/dapl_bpool.c 2005-06-24 >halr> 23:47:43.000000000 -0400 >halr> @@ -356,8 +356,8 @@ [snip full patch] James,
Don't mean to sound rude, but imagine there *still* are modem-users around! That may sound odd to you as you're well connected, still those do exists.. May i kindly ask that you do *not* quote the patch you ACK'ed but just the subj/thread? Folks interrested still can readup in the mail-archives. Look at e.g. Roland, who also does not quote the patch itself but politely follows-up with something along the lines of 'comitted'. Thank you. Yours sincerely, _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
