That is a reasonable migration plan, as long as rebuild is the only step required after fetching and placing the kdat.h file.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 8:40 AM > To: Caitlin Bestler > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openib-general > Subject: Re: [openib-general] RE: [dat-discussions] comments > on DATregistry in OpenIB > > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 20:19 -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote: > > Source compatability for an existing Provider is *not* > maintained by > > OpenIB kDAPL because there are fields *missing* from the Provider > > Info. That > > *will* > > result in a compilation error. > > I have no problem with there being a header file with allows > for source compatibility. This header would be maintained by > OpenIB, but never included in upstream. I think James has a > start of such a header called kdat.h. It needs a bunch more > to make it follow the DAT conventions. > > -tduffy > > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
